临床检验危急值警示阈值确定方案调查
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

北京市自然科学基金(7143182);北京医院课题资助(BJ-2015-025)。


Investigations on the determination methods of alert thresholds for critical values in clinical laboratories
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:目的:回顾性分析成人临床生物化学和血液学检验危急值警示阈值的相关文献,并统计警示阈值的证据来源。 方法:检索2006至2016年文献,用1999年斯德哥尔摩检验医学分析性能规范对证据来源评估与分级。 结果:确定了临床检验危急值警示阈值报告数量最多的30个分析物,并以证据等级形式呈现。92篇报告临床检验危急值警示阈值的文献显示了4种警示阈值的确定方案,70%由个体机构建立,18%来自临床实验室或临床医生的调查,2%来源于专业机构的推荐,10%通过临床研究结果评估;其证据来源分别为4、3、2、1级。7种分析物用前后检验结果的差值(δ)作为警示阈值。 结论:目前临床检验危急值警示阈值的确定方案以个体机构建立为主,其次是来自临床医生或临床实验室的调查,总体证据来源级别较低。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective:To retrospectively analyze the literature of alert thresholds for the critical values of clinical biochemistry and hematology tests in adults, and collect the evidence source of these alert thresholds. Methods:The literatures during 2006 and 2016 were retrieved, and the evidence sources were evaluated and ranked using the 1999 Stockholm hierarchy for analytical performance specifications in laboratory medicine. Results:Thirty most frequently reported laboratory tests with alert thresholds were presented with evidence rankings. Four determination methods of alert thresholds were reported in 92 articles with alert thresholds for critical values. Among them, 70% of alert thresholds were set by individual institutions, 18% by the surveys of clinical laboratories or clinicians, 2% by the recommendation of professional institutions, and 10% by the evaluation of clinical findings. The sources of these alert thresholds were ranked into level 4, level 3, level 2 and leve 1, respectively. In addition, the alert thresholds of 7 clinical laboratory tests were presented as critical δ values. Conclusion:The alert thresholds are set mainly by individual institutions in current clinical laboratories, followed by the surveys of clinical laboratories or clinicians. Moreover, the general level of evidence source is lower.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

段敏,赵海建,王薇,王治国.临床检验危急值警示阈值确定方案调查[J].临床检验杂志,2017,(6):470-475

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-07-03
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者  苏ICP备13058113号-3
苏公网安备32010202012004号
主管单位:江苏省医学会  出版单位:临床检验杂志
单位地址:江苏省南京市中央路42号  邮编:210008
电话:025-83620683 E-MAIL:lcjyzz@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司