头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合氨曲南对产金属酶肠杆菌目细菌的药敏试验方法学评价
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

云南省“兴滇英才支持计划”(XDYC-MY-2022-0063);云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项(202301AY070001-291)


Methodological evaluation of the susceptibility testing for ceftazidime/ avibactam combined with aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:目的评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CZA)联合氨曲南(ATM)对产金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)肠杆菌目细菌的药敏试验方法性能,探索一种简单、准确且具有推广价值的联合药敏试验方法。方法收集昆明医科大学第一附属医院2022年12月至2023年12月临床分离的碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌目细菌(CRE),采用肉汤微量稀释法测定CZA和ATM的药敏情况,通过PCR检测blakpc、blanom、blaym、blamp和blaoxa4g5种耐药基因,筛选对两种药物均不敏感且产MBL的菌株。以肉汤微量稀释法检测CZA联合ATM的协同作用,并将其结果作为金标准,评估纸条优加法、纸条交叉法、纸片优加法、纸片扩散法和肉汤纸片洗脱法5种联合药敏试验方法的性能。结果共收集416株CRE,其中对CZA、ATM均不敏感菌株38株,产MBL菌株29株。纸片扩散法与肉汤纸片洗脱法敏感性、特异性、一致性(CA)及重复性均为100%,性能最佳;纸片优加法敏感性71%、CA72.7%,性能最差;纸条交叉法优于纸条优加法(敏感性93%vs.85%,CA93.1%vs.86.4%),均具有良好重复性(100%)。结论纸条交叉法性能较好且可报告最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值,适合指导临床用药。纸片扩散法操作简单,但结果不容易判读,可用于初筛。肉汤纸片洗脱法操作简便、成本低、结果易于判读,适于临床微生物实验室推广应用。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological performance of the susceptibility testing for ceftazidime/ avibactam (CZA) com-bined with aztreonam(ATM) against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales,and explore a simple,accurate,andwidely applicable combined susceptibility testing method. MethodsThe carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolated from the First Affliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between December 2022 and December 2023were collected. The suscepti-bility of CZA and ATM was determined by the broth microdilution method, and PCRwas used to detect five carbapenemase genes, in-cludingblaxpc,blapm,blaym,blawp,andblaoxa4s.Thestrainsresistant toCZAandATMandproducingMBLwerescreened.The synergistic effect of CZA combined withATMwas evaluated using the broth microdilution method,and its results served as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of five combined susceptibility testing methods such as the strip stacking,strip crossing,disk stacking,disk diffusion, and broth disk elution. ResultsA total of 416 CRE strains were collected. Among them,38 strains were resistant to both CZA and ATM, and 29 produced MBL. The disk diffusion and broth disk elution methods had the best performance,with 100% of sensitivity,specificity,categoricalagreement(CA),and reproducibility.The diskstacking method exhibited 71%of sensitivity and 72.7% of CA,with the poorest performance. The strip crossing method outperformed the strip stacking method, with sensitivities of 93% and 85%,and CA of 93.1% and 86.4%,respectively. Both showed excellent repoducibility((100%). ConclusionThe strip crossing method has better performance and can report the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC),making it suitable for guiding clinical medication. The disk difusion method is simple to operate but its results are not easily interpreted,making it suitable for pre-liminaryscreening.Thebrothdisk elutionmethod issimple tooperate andcost-effective,and its results are easilyinterpreted,making it suitable for widespread application in clinical microbiology laboratories.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭兰花,张鸿娟,苏艳丹,董小雪,李欣玥,黄美佳,李少轩,单斌.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合氨曲南对产金属酶肠杆菌目细菌的药敏试验方法学评价[J].临床检验杂志,2026,44(03):171-175

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者  苏ICP备13058113号-3
苏公网安备32010202012004号
主管单位:江苏省医学会  出版单位:临床检验杂志
单位地址:江苏省南京市中央路42号  邮编:210008
电话:025-83620683 E-MAIL:lcjyzz@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司